I'd strongly doubt that the Pietta parts are going to fit the Uberi frame. Too much trouble to even try. What is wrong with having the brass frame ? If you want a pistol with steel frame buy another. Cabelas has them on sale. I bought one this fall.
I agree w/ Wolfgang on this. The brass frame is quite servicable if loads are kept within reason. The end cost of making this change will equal or exceed the price of a new ( Blued) steel frame model. Better to keep looking for a nickled Pietta frame and even then be prepared to do a lot of fitting.
JDD
I have given up on the possibility of changing the brass frame only. Not cost productive. I suspect the the parts will not interchange between Uberti and Pietta.
However I think I will get a price on the nickel , steel frame, parts gun offered and see if I can restore it.
If you guys don't know the difference in brass and steel frames. There is not much I can say.
Other than, brass framed guns are not compatible with my style of shooting.
I have had several of both types over the years.
BTW- I bought one of Cabela's 1860 case hardened frame on sale for $200. Exc. buy.
What offends me is people who butt in and cut and paste my comments. Then interpet them to a neg.
You have not contributed anything of value. Why are you here on my thread.?
Are you now spokesperson for other posters on this thread?
Take a pass and move on, if you don't like what you see here.
If the wording is offensive to the two that posted about brass frames, I'm sorry if my wording was not what I intended to convey. Certainly, not trying to be offensive in response to you trying to help.
I have shot loose several brass framed revolvers using 20 grains.
I didn't think an explanation was called for.
I shoot long range nowdays and use max loads in my Rogers & Spencer, Uberti, Old Army and others. Now I'm going to try Piettas with long barrels.
It is my style. Short range shooting has become boring.
I shoot all my hand guns to the max range possible.
I am not sorry to anyone that butts in with cut and paste neg. interpetations of my comments on my thread.
I have solved this current problem with the nickel revolvers and if JB has any more gripes about how I word things. Take them to the minefield or PM.
I'm available.
I wil report this to the mod. and let him decide who is trolling and offensive here.
Suspect the mod will take umbrage, if he does, with your reaction, RH7777 - it is a sort of personal attack, and not really desireable. Goes a good bit further than JB White's, seems to me.
I may have been out of line. I don't know. I've re-read this thing several times and I still perceive it the same way. It's up to moderation now. Whatever happens, happens.
If shooting full loads . . . . then steel framed revolvers are a necessity . . . I started out with a brass framed '58 Remington by Pietta . . . and I only once loaded up 15 gr. of BLACK with filler . . . I fired two rounds and pulled the rest, . . . went to full loads . . . and got me some steel framed guns before that first one had got shot loose ( only put about 100 rounds thru it ) . . . I did get another brass framed one ( on sale cheap ) just cuz the first one was "lonely" and needed a "companion".
Anyhow . . . to go back to the origin of this thread, . . . swapping parts between Italian replica manufacturers isn't practical, . . . and if shooting full loads is your thing, . . . ( like it is MINE ) then it is better to retire the brass framed pistols or sell them and go to steel frames. Simple.
If shooting full loads . . . . then steel framed revolvers are a necessity . . . I started out with a brass framed '58 Remington by Pietta . . . and I only once loaded up 15 gr. of BLACK with filler . . . I fired two rounds and pulled the rest, . . . went to full loads . . . and got me some steel framed guns before that first one had got shot loose ( only put about 100 rounds thru it ) . . . I did get another brass framed one ( on sale cheap ) just cuz the first one was "lonely" and needed a "companion".
Anyhow . . . to go back to the origin of this thread, . . . swapping parts between Italian replica manufacturers isn't practical, . . . and if shooting full loads is your thing, . . . ( like it is MINE ) then it is better to retire the brass framed pistols or sell them and go to steel frames. Simple.
I should have been more clear as to my intention and purpose.
I found out the hard way about the brass framed revolvers.
I do have an 1851 replica with a brass frame that I bought on a sale from Cabela, I don't shoot it.
But keep it for looks and it is balanced perfectly and is a nice looking replica.
It was under $200.
I have quite a number of BP revolvers and buy them whenever I find a good deal.
I have found the Walkers to be too heavy, but the Ruger Old Army heavy hitter is OK.
I also bought a Rogers and Spencer which takes large loads and I really like it.
I have been selling off my milsurps to finance the BP.
THe light loads just don't do it for me.
I like to shoot the max loads they will handle.
I normally don't like "flashy" guns, but the 1860 in nickel, I like. When I bought it, I didn't know it had a brass frame and I didn't think to ask.
I agree the changing parts between Pietta and Uberti is not a good idea.
Ruling on the field: Personal Foul, Offensive team, 15 yard penalty. Face Mask Deffensive team, 15 yard penalty. Penaltys cancel each other. Resume play, 3rd down and 5 yards ----
I have fitted a Griswold High Standard to a brass frame navy revolver. I did not mod the frame or cyl pin only the barrel. I now have a new Griswold pietta coming in and want to fit the old high standard to that one. I doubt it will be much trouble.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Gunboards Forums
5.7M posts
131.5K members
Since 2007
A forum community dedicated to all firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, makes, models, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!