Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 45 of 138

Thread: Mosin a Survival Rifle?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    151

    Default Mosin a Survival Rifle?

    Would a Mosin be a suitable survival rifle? With all these preppers/survivalist showing up I thought it would be a good topic to discuss. Personally I think it is to big of a caliber, tad on the heavy side as far as carry weight, with that said there is alot of pro's as well to a mosin, especially a M38 or M44 type rifle in a survival situation. Anyway, what do you guys think?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Dark and Bloody Ground
    Posts
    4,218

    Default

    If I were of a persuasion to have a "prepper" rifle, I'd gravitate toward something like an sks. I think a semiauto would have advantages.

    However, IMO if things ever get to that stage, there's no hope anyway.
    Proletarian collector of primarily garden-variety refurbs (because "quantity has a quality all its own"), but a bit "beergeois" (because life is too short for lite beer).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,050

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ol' Relic View Post
    If I were of a persuasion to have a "prepper" rifle, I'd gravitate toward something like an sks. I think a semiauto would have advantages.

    However, IMO if things ever get to that stage, there's no hope anyway.
    +1 Don't think I want to go against anybody with semi and full auto, and me with a 5 round bolt. Just my opinion.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    15,836

    Default

    Only takes one shot-
    Owner/Administrator of Gunboards.com
    Mosin Nagant.net
    Michigan Historical Collectables

    "Tulta munille!"

    "Terror is not a new weapon. Throughout history it has been used by those who could not prevail, either by persuasion or example. But inevitably they fail, either because men are not afraid to die for a life worth living, or because the terrorists themselves came to realize that free men cannot be frightened by threats, and that aggression would meet its own response. And it is in the light of that history that every nation today should know, be he friend or foe, that the United States has both the will and the weapons to join free men in standing up to their responsibilities."
    John F. Kennedy

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Dark and Bloody Ground
    Posts
    4,218

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vic View Post
    Only takes one shot-
    If there's only one of 'em it does, but in a SHTF scenario, they'd be coming after your food, wife, daughter, shelter, etc. in mobs. Now, it would be useful to have somebody posted at an advantage of height with a pu.
    Proletarian collector of primarily garden-variety refurbs (because "quantity has a quality all its own"), but a bit "beergeois" (because life is too short for lite beer).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,050

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vic View Post
    Only takes one shot-
    Not if there's more than one of them.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    151

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 91/30refurb View Post
    Not if there's more than one of them.
    Wonder how willingy a group of people will be to continue an attack after watching one buddy get hit by a 7.62x54r round. I would say they would probably stop and go find an easier target. ;-)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,344

    Default

    interesting question the answer depends on your parameters for survival, are you just wanting something to kill some meat and pick off the occaisional mad max marauder? The mosin would be just fine. Think about the history of the rifle with the Finns, small groups out in the harshest survival environment you can imagine with meager supplies in groups of skiers that would disrupt and discourage the largest army on the face of the earth at the time against overwhelming odds. In the end the question is answered more by the survivor than the weapon. A drive to survive combined with knowledge and preparedness with an average weapon will last longer than a superior weapon with an inferior man.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Dark and Bloody Ground
    Posts
    4,218

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soldaten View Post
    Wonder how willingy a group of people will be to continue an attack after watching one buddy get hit by a 7.62x54r round. I would say they would probably stop and go find an easier target. ;-)
    If things ever got that ugly, you'd probably be amazed at the lengths people would go to and the tenacity they'd display. After all, our ancestors saw their friends have their skulls crushed by the large animals they were hunting (and hunting against), and they kept plugging away.
    Proletarian collector of primarily garden-variety refurbs (because "quantity has a quality all its own"), but a bit "beergeois" (because life is too short for lite beer).

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,050

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soldaten View Post
    Wonder how willingy a group of people will be to continue an attack after watching one buddy get hit by a 7.62x54r round. I would say they would probably stop and go find an easier target. ;-)
    Some people would have no problems running the other way, others would not.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Western WA
    Posts
    197

    Default

    I would say yes. Uses less ammo in the long run. Very few moving parts, rugged, durable...You can keep Your SKS/AK...I for one will be hauling My Mosin with me to My fall back point...

    ..And Yes, I am a 22 Year Army Vet, Multiple Combat Deployments, Survival Trained...So My Opinion is an informed one...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Pueblo West Colorado
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Depending on what you have to survive, the Mosin Nagant has merits. The rifle and its ammo are very affordable. One can buy a Mosin Nagant and have a rifle right away. If they waited until they saved enough for a high speed low drag rifle, they might be unarmed when TSHTF. They may also buy more than one. Mosins are simple, rugged and powerful. They would be well suited to arm a non gun oriented friend or family member and have them trained in minimum time.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    151

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tiger 13 View Post
    I would say yes. Uses less ammo in the long run. Very few moving parts, rugged, durable...You can keep Your SKS/AK...I for one will be hauling My Mosin with me to My fall back point...

    ..And Yes, I am a 22 Year Army Vet, Multiple Combat Deployments, Survival Trained...So My Opinion is an informed one...
    First off, thanks for your service! Next I would have to agree that AK/AR's are ammo guzzling whores, so the mosin carrying people would most likely have ammo supplies longer than people carrying a semi-auto weapon.

  14. #14

    Default

    Well it would be better than nothing and there are worse options I suppose. It is certainly less than ideal.
    Want to buy: a nice Finnish M28

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    6,802

    Default

    Considering that most of the '' troublemakers ''

    would be thinned out after about 2 weeks , I

    think the Mosin rifle would be an exceptional

    survival rifle .



    FIVESHOT
    ________________
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	VET.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	11.4 KB 
ID:	587360

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,033

    Default

    I'd me more likely to carry a Mosin than any other surplus bolt rifle, preferable a good PU sniper. Maybe an 8mm Mauser, but 7.62x54r is probably much more common nowadays. It would need to be paired with a decent .22 as most game would be small birds, squirrels, etc. and a reliable semiauto pistol or better yet a revolver.

    Keith

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,540

    Default

    The only similar situation I had to deal with was the Martin Luther King riots in which hundreds of buildings were burned and many killed in urban chaos. I was 16 and guarded our family alone -my father overseas. I turned off all the lights to avoid giving targets, put all my family in an upstairs rear bedroom in the dark, and set up for myself a well-concealed hide in the dark by our porch, watching as cars of rioters with Molotov cocktails cruised the streets looking to burn out homes and businesses and loot others. I still remember the shotguns out the windows of the cars -a rude introduction to reality. I had only a .22 revolver with a 7 inch barrel and 9 shot cylinder, but I was very good with it out to the 30 yards or so to the street, was hidden very well in darkness in dark clothes and had the element of surprise, but I didn't have to shoot as numerous cars of looters passed us by. Talk about growing up fast!
    A Mosin would have worked fine in that situation as five shots would have easily ended any normal threat at a distance before anyone could get close, shooting through cars if needed. An AK would have been better, but I would have been fine with a Mosin. The scary night ended when the National Guard set up a .30 cal machine gun and blocked access to my neighborhood, ending the siege.

    An AK is a very inaccurate rifle for long distance defense or taking of game and shoots a lot less reliably through barriers than a Mosin, so I guess I'd choose the Mosin for most open country survival situations -I think urban defense against mobs is a different situation that would best be solved with about 10 Claymores and a Quad .50. In normal survival ("escape and evasion"), hiding is more important than trying to fight.

    Probably a good gun combo for survival might be a quality stainless .22 revolver like a Ruger Single Six, a Mosin carbine and a stainless .22 rifle like a 10/22 with a scope, but everyone has to make up their own scenario of what sort of problem they anticipate. Total doomsday is very different than urban disorder or earthquake disruptions or terrorist shutdowns of major systems. As for zombies...

    Addendum: My home defense firearms now are a pair of light-fitted Glock 22s in .40 Hornady Critical Defense with extended mags and a tactical pistol grip Winchester 12 gauge, with #4 buck, but .22s would certainly work for most survival situations -the Air Force got the old AR-7 .22 survival rifle and down in Mexico only .22s are allowed -they take even deer with them.
    Last edited by Stalin's Ghost; 09-18-2012 at 11:55 PM. Reason: typo

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    951

    Default

    I would use a M1 garand ! Its fast and easy to load and dependable

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    611

    Default

    The reality is that initially - anything that will go "Bang" is preferable to something that won't....

    The death knell is ammo and parts availability.... That would do in most Super-Extra-Ultra Mag and oddball cartridge rifles... as they turn into clubs pretty fast... I think you would see the majority of stuff like this ditched when Joe Hunter or Collector shoots up his 1 box of 325-Super-Extra-Uber-Joober-Ultra-Mag or 18.59 Goobenheimer Waffen-Poofen..

    If you know ammo is going to be available - then sure, it's a fine survival rifle... It would easily be on my list with the Enfield and Mauser rifles when you are talking battle and terrible condition proven designs... but ammo still trumps all that good stuff.... If all you can get is 22lr and 12-gage shotgun - you better have one of those....

    Thanks

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    North Dakota
    Posts
    777

    Default

    I'd want to use something that had plenty of ammo to be found anywhere. I've got 15k+ rounds of 54R on hand, so that would last a while, I would hope. But in my neck of the woods .30-06, .223, or .308 would be everywhere, so it might make more sense to have something chambered for those cartridges. A Mosin might not be my first choice (my STG-58 carbine would be), but I'd be comfortable with a Mosin if that was all I had.

    Cheers,

    ~ Greg ~


    Sent from my HTC Thunderbolt using Tapatalk 2.
    "Any people whatsoever have the right to abolish the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable, a most sacred right." -- Abraham Lincoln, 4 July 1848

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    43

    Default

    The rugged nature of bolt actions and the affordability of 7.62x54r, I say the Mosin fits the bill pretty well. It is a hard hitting round, decent range, decent accuracy. I can buy 3 tins per 1000k of 5.56/7.62x39. This is followed by a good .22lr, be it bolt, semi, revolver, hand gun... The biggest factor with anything is the person holding the gun...
    Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good.
    Ayn Rand

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,540

    Default

    I'd just dig out 20 or 30 Mosins, kit out my neighborhood militia, fix bayonets and call martial law. They could call me "Fearless Leader" or "Uncle Joe."
    Needless to say, all assets would be the property of "the people," that is to say, me.
    (Sort of like Washington D.C, but in reverse.)

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Where we put slaw and chili on hamburgers and hotdogs
    Posts
    1,543

    Default

    I'm thinking that if i'm going to half to defend myself or others from looters/ thieves and the like, they're probably going to be armed as well. So, I'm not sure a bolt action is going to be my weapon of choice. However, If defending my home in a SHTF scenario, I'm going to have something at every window and most will be bolt guns.
    The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

    Steamer

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    193

    Default

    It's too darn heavy and too darn long, not to mention a rather crude bolt action to suit 'my' notion of a survival rifle. I'd have to give a survivalist nod to the highly portable AK/AR platforms. Lighter ammo means you can tote a lot more of it and still have an effective weapon at hand.
    '45 Tula M1895 revolver,'42 Izhevsk 91/30 various other firearms in .22LR, .380, 7.62x25, 7.62x38R, 7.62x54R, 9mm and .45ACP. Lee reloading gear.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,573

    Default

    Wow Ghost. What a story!
    Agree about hiding rather than trying to fight off a hoard, if possible.

    When it comes to defending the 'castle', Mosins would be fine. Rifle and ammo weight isn't a concern if you're not traveling. Accurate enough to keep the perimeter cleared. Reliable and easy to clean. Powerful enough to disable vehicles, or shoot through barriers. Be sure to have enough of them to arm everyone in the fort, and plenty of ammo stockpiled. Good as a gun to hand out, or to trade for food. I love them, but not my first choice for survival. Although if it's all I had, I'd be confident.

    My choice for weapons to carry a long distance would be .22 rifles and handguns. They are light weight, quick to point, fairly quiet, and you can carry a lot of ammo. Plenty deadly with good shot placement, and in semi-auto mode even a group could be dealt with. Reliability could be an issue though.

    For short missions to gather food, water or intelligence, an AK is fairly light and has enough firepower to take on multiple bad guys. Also very intimidating, even without firing it. Will kill any game animal if required.

    To hunt game for food, a shotgun with a variety of loads would be ideal. Also good for close-quarters defense.

    A sniper rifle of some sort would be best to keep your position hidden, while eliminating an approaching threat at a distance..... Whether at home or traveling.

    Always carry a reliable pistol in dangerous times, but I think the rifle would depend on the task at hand. I guess (at least) one of each type should be kept ready, since we can't be sure what kind of threat will occur. And it would be nice to have something that will shoot any common caliber of ammo found or traded for. Ammo will be the new currency.

    If force to pick only one, a 1911 pistol. If I could add a second it would be an AK. A 12 gauge would come after that. Something accurate at long range would be next. Then the Mosins.

    Phil

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    536

    Default

    layerd defense and a bug out plan B would work. 91/30 PU then sks, followed by saiga 12 and a 1911. if its just you against the wilderness, 12ga and a 22 would work well. i keep a savage 22-410 over under handy when at hunting camp to keep the stew pot full. simple design and dosent burn up alot of ammo. secure shelter and reliable water supply would be more important than what type of weapon or ammo. just make shure you have plenty on hand and train with your weapon before the zombie apocalypse.
    Last edited by shjoe; 09-19-2012 at 02:17 AM.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    1,984

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 91/30refurb View Post
    Not if there's more than one of them.
    Well....then what'cha can do is manuever 'em around until ya get 'em all lined up.....one behind the other and then................
    Just one more Mosin and my collection will be complete!

    It takes a whole village to raise an idiot.

    Hope ...is just disappointment protracted.

    Sometimes when we cross a bridge in life we should burn it behind us so our enemies cannot follow.

    I'm looking for an SKS rear receiver cover with the sn 01822.

    Democrats!!..the original flamers of the Constitution.

    "My poor Krell !" ....yes, and I fear they are us.

    China out of USA!.....Feng Shui, no way!

  28. #28
    rocker98's Avatar
    rocker98 is offline Diamond with Gold Oak Clusters and Swords Bullet Member
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    6,474

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soldaten View Post
    Would a Mosin be a suitable survival rifle?
    Depends on what one considers "suitable survival". Those two words would depend on your situation. Suitable survival against a rattler? Overkill. Suitable survival against Islamists attacking your consulate? Depends on how much ammo you have, your defensive position, and what they can bring in return. It's relative to your situation at hand.

    For me, multiple platforms would be necessary for suitable survival in any situation. Hell, if I could have a tank...but even that could be a death trap in the wrong situation.

    Now, that being said, you bet I'd have a Mosin Nagant in the mix. I have lots of ammo. And at this point, I am best with my 1940 Tula DDR 91/30 rifle. Always in the black @ 100yds. You want to disperse a crowd? Hold the trigger on a trench gun and start pumping. Claymores would be sweet. Can I get those with a C&R? Tactical nukes would be best against LARGE hordes.

    Whats your situation? I'm for overwhelming force in any situation. That's "suitable survival" to me. The weapon depends on your situation, and your opponent.

    Is the Mosin Nagant a suitable survival rifle? Ask the soldiers of the red army in WWII. I think they would say "yes". There was a picture posted of a female in Africa somewhere with an M38. I think she would say "yes" too. Ask any one who's only rifle is a Mosin Nagant, and I think they would say "better than nothing at all".

    I would agree.
    Gary


    ***WARNING*** Mosins breed like rabbits!

    "In shallow men the fish of little thoughts cause much commotion. In oceanic minds the whales of inspiration make hardly a ruffle." SRI PARAMHANSA YOGANANDA

    A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have. Gerald R. Ford


  29. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,312

    Default

    One thing I like about the current crop of mosins, especially locally for those without a c&r ffl, is that the mosins are $120 with spike bayos on sale at Big 5, and plentiful elsewhere at a lower cost, and ammo isn't a bank breaker, the buttplates are steel for buttstroking attackers, and lets not forget that unruly killers bent on whatever can still be bayonetted apart from being shot in self defense, you can't try that with a scoped hunting rifle.
    I think those without any gun or just a .22 and a shotgun should also have a mosin around and some surplus ammo, just cause they are plentiful, cheap, and idiot proof generally, the best value this year. Shotguns, those are also overlooked, the ammo doesn't generally fly off the shelves in a panic, and .22lr, guarantee you most folks if it came to it will find out they have .22 ammo that doesn't work right in their gun or was stored improperly and doesn't fire, of which reminds me and word to the wise, if there is a panic that .22 ammo won't generally be available for like a year to year and a half, and I haven't stocked up on at least a thousand rounds for plinking/target fun, got low several years ago when it became in short supply, I ended just training with snap caps in full size guns to practice pistol and rifle shooting.
    Once I started lifting weights again seriously, and using a total gym exerciser to rehabilitate an injury to my leg I've had for four years, I pick up a mosin pu sniper and remark how light it feels as opposed to several years ago, very light, and I aint a big guy either.
    Last edited by AndGunsForAll; 09-19-2012 at 05:26 AM.

  30. #30

    Default

    In this day and age a bolt action rifle would be my last choice for a survival weapon unless your survival strategy relied on sniper tactics. I would not want to engage multiple threats with a 5 rnd capacity weapon. I dont believe a Mosin is anymore reliable than a SKS/AK semi auto. I would want the ability to produce a volume of fire adequate enough to surpress a horde of evil doers. I think an AK/AR type of weapon would fit the bill here. What would you rather lug around a hundred rounds of 7.62x54 or the same amount in 5.56 or 7.62x39 ?........just my 2 cents
    Last edited by Bullpup Dogg; 09-19-2012 at 06:30 AM.

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Home
    Posts
    255

    Default

    I got to shoot a m16 the other day for the first time. And it was fun. How ever if I wanted to hit something at 200 yards or more I'd sure want one of my mosins. If it was a 50 yard battle I'd take a m16 or AR type deal.
    Jeremy B


  32. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremyb View Post
    I got to shoot a m16 the other day for the first time. And it was fun. How ever if I wanted to hit something at 200 yards or more I'd sure want one of my mosins. If it was a 50 yard battle I'd take a m16 or AR type deal.
    Sorry, but If you cant hit a target at 200 yards or more with an AR, It wont matter what rifle you have.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    656

    Default

    As a survival weapong, I'd think it would be fine. For a more SHTF type weapon, it wouldn't be as good. If I were in a world where I had to roam the lands taking game and maybe occasionally defending myself, I'd be ok with my favorite shooting M44. I'd take my Enfield No. 4 over it first though. I'd probably take either one over my scoped Weatherby .30-06. I figure the scope on that would break quickly, and then I'd have no sights whatsoever on the gun. I have a Ruger Mk. III .22lr that I would intend to carry in my pack for small game, and a Glock for a sidearm.

    For a SHTF weapon the Mosin has some positives as well though. Ammo is currently abundant and affordable. You can buy a ton and stock up your hunkering down location of choice. You can also buy several Mosins to equip friends and family if need be. A small group of good shots, with a little practice loading, in a superior defensive position, should be able to hold their own against marauders.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,806

    Default

    I think of "survival rifle" as something needed for living in the woods and having to feed one's family. If things ever get to mass chaos like what people here describe, there's not a lot of hope. In the collapse of supply chains and food production, the wild game population would be exhausted in short order. Only in the event of massive death due to disease, war or catastrophe could nature sustain a smaller population, in which case cooperation among survivors is more likely in an effort to support local agriculture.

    To answer the question, I think a Mosin would be ideal. Simple, rugged, fairly accurate at hunting distances, power to kill food in one shot, easily slung across the back. Mainly, it would endure poor conditions (dirty, lack of gun oil or proper cleaning supplies) well, and wouldn't jam in frigid weather.
    Nothing worthwhile ever comes easily.

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    3,381

    Default

    Survive? Or go to war?

    Survival: priority 1 is water.
    Number two is food.
    three is the ability to start fire.
    Four would be shelter
    Five would be tools, of which, a firearm might be handy depending on the particulars but a knife would be indispensable.

    The 7.62x54r cartridge will down any game animal in North America, so there is much to recommend it.
    The Mosin-Nagant rifle design is antiquated, but it is reliable and simple.

    I don't think anyone would want to go to war with a Mosin-Nagant. The fact is, it was used in very many wars, including the worst ones. The Soviet manual reveals that it can smite enemies through aimed fire out to 400 meters or so, used as a club, and makes a spear with the issue bayonet. That's three weapons right there.

    In WWII engagement ranges were typically shorter than small arms designers had prepared for. A civilian would have even closer ranges, say within 35 yards if not the more typical 15-feet. Armies relied on different uniforms and helmets and silly hats to identify the enemy. The armed civilian does not have that criteria... Look at hands to determine whether someone is a potential threat. How far away can you see what a person is holding in his/her hands?

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,764

    Default

    read the QUESTION.
    would it be a suitable survivle rifle.....

    the answer is yes, any rifle will do as oppose to no rifle.

    is it the BEST....that is an opened argument
    and lots of opinions...
    ask the afgans and the losing russians what they think of the mosin...the afgans "survived" with them...
    in town...maybe not the best choice....

    mike in co

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    7,679

    Default

    Gents, instead of the platform being the solution, take a look at the caliber it shoots and what you want
    dropped. We have a board member Caribou who survives in austere circumstances in Alaska and he uses
    a Mosin (mostly Finn M39 which lights a fire under all the Finn Fanatics here ) and has enough Gun for year in and year out subsistence. He is as likely to run into a close encounter with a bear as you might encounter the Hulk coming up your driveway to do harm. I recommend reading Caribou's hunting threads
    for appreciation of what a 30 caliber 150 and heavier grain bullet will do .

    If you define survival as Zulu Dawn scenario then the bolt rifle is not ideal and the semi auto menu of rifles in 30 caliber is far better. Some may be inclined for 5.56 for this scenario and you will be well served as well. In Stalins Ghost's scenario, back in that day, a M4 would have been my choice over any M1, FN FAL or AK that I own. However in my more open neighborhood, I have my FN FAL stoked and ready.

    Weapons are tools and truth be known, you'll grab the one you are most trained on and efficient on using. So if you aren't shooting Mosins alot, have the shot gun ready. If you train (shoot) with a Mosin routinely, then both you and the rifle are in a ready status. Give some thought to that. Give thought to a pistol for back up.

    I have neighbors with Mosins and strength of character to use them. I have a neighbor with a lever action Marlin who is not going to be ill armed if the time comes.

    If this thread does not shine a light on what you think is needed, just have a Mosin and one spam can of ammo on site and sleep well at night. As a minimum, the Mosin will bring in the bacon and drop threats dead in their track. As Vic said... only takes one shot.

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Where we put slaw and chili on hamburgers and hotdogs
    Posts
    1,543

    Default

    Im gonna recommend a good book on this subject. Not a gun book but a book about trying to survive and all that we take for granted in our daily lives.

    One Second After, by William Forstchen. It'll make you think.
    The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

    Steamer

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    810

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soldaten View Post
    First off, thanks for your service! Next I would have to agree that AK/AR's are ammo guzzling whores, so the mosin carrying people would most likely have ammo supplies longer than people carrying a semi-auto weapon.
    That depends entirely on who's pulling the trigger. There's nothing in the design of either an AK or AR that forces the shooter to waste ammo.

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,795

    Default

    You may want to jump to the SURVIVAL Forum ...
    Depending on budget and needs, a Mosin can have a place. Consider: cheap, rugged, reliable, low maintenance, limited moving parts to lose/break, inexpensive ammo that can be bought in bulk.
    However, a long 91/30 has some physical drawbacks. An M38 or M44 may be a bit more comfortable to sling over your shoulder and carry if you are on the move. The shorter carbines lose nothing in accuracy out to 200yds or more.
    7.62x54R is a whopper on power comparable to most other .30 rounds. It only takes one hit to leave a huge impression.
    With adequate training and practice, you will be amazed how fast you can cycle the bolt and make fairly rapid shots at multiple targets.
    If I had to forage through heavy woods to hunt, I would likely choose my custom M44 to sling over my shoulder. I know I could take down a deer or a man at 220m with iron sights.

    That being said, nothing against a Mosin as a cheap first choice rifle for someone starting out, however;
    You need to obtain the right tools for the job.
    That includes, but is not limited to:
    A handgun for close up personal defense
    A shotgun, pump action for reliability, preferably compact and in "tactical" dress for close range defense, with other accessories and additional barrels for hunting
    An "intermediate range" semi-auto carbine for "urban combat"
    A rifle for longer range hunting, where the Mosin fits nicely
    A long range scoped rifle for distance "stand off" shooting

    Many choices and considerations on all the above. Buy what you can afford to fit in your budget but don't limit yourself to any one particular "tool". Build a "toolbox" with the right tools for the particular job.

  41. #41

    Default

    I've always read these shtf discusions with a bit of wtf. Most of them are 1 guy standing off hoardes like Rambo ,or heading to the hills alone , or with the family . Mosin nagant as a survival rifle you bet, those of us that read these forums tend to get hung up on caliber or specifc type of rifle .Probably for the average blue collar guy a mosin ,and 1000 rnds put aside would be a good thing learn how to shoot it, and put away for just in case. If it ever comes to real shtf you had better get organized fast , friends, family, coworkers ,comunity . Pick wich side your going to be on and dig in ,your street,your town your state ,your country.Four or five guys in the middle of the street firing remington 870s with 00 buckshot will stop any mob. If it ever comes to real shtf they aint going to like what happens to them or niether will you . The best weapon is your vote ,and get this country back on course.

  42. #42

    Default

    Depends for me. Lets say in a unlikely-made up scenario of Foreign troops on U.S. soil,If it came to conflict,I would grab first my 1943 PU sniper-Can't go wrong with it,Accurate,Reliable,Excellent scope - I personally wouldn't take anything past 4X in the field. I'd actually choose my PU over my Rem. 700, seriously.

  43. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Oldsmar, FL (Tampa Bay)
    Posts
    21,806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soldaten View Post
    With all these preppers/survivalist showing up I thought it would be a good topic to discuss.
    How about Zombies? Vampires? A werewolf epidemic?
    Puhleeeze! Stuff like that and survivalism may be fun but lets try and keep this serious and avoid topics off the subject, and that may lead to useless chopping up of C&Rs.

    And any survivalists that take offense, you can try and find any industrialized nation that's ever had an such collapse. Even recent TV SF shows have to resort to alien invasions or a mysterious disappearance of electricity.
    I swear by Jupiter Optimus Maximus .... in the army of the consul Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus and for 10 miles around it I will not steal anything worth more than a sestertius in any one day.

  44. #44
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    3,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Foley View Post
    Depends for me. Lets say in a unlikely-made up scenario of Foreign troops on U.S. soil,If it came to conflict,I would grab first my 1943 PU sniper-Can't go wrong with it,Accurate,Reliable,Excellent scope - I personally wouldn't take anything past 4X in the field. I'd actually choose my PU over my Rem. 700, seriously.
    Lol:
    You? Y'all ain't no Wolverines.
    http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/independent/reddawn/


  45. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Central Californnia
    Posts
    395

    Default

    Any rifle would be handy, provided the shooter has some training. If I were headed to the hills, as it were, I would bring mine. I have a big family and a lot of guns. But if I had to take only one rifle it would be my mini 14; it's about as accurate as a laser beam. It only takes one shot. Living in central CA, I could see a situation where an earthquake takes out the delta levees and ruins the water supply for LA, causing some to riot and such over water. Possible, but not very likely. On another note, a Mosin will hold six rounds; one in the chamber and 5 in the magazine. I loaded mine that way just to see if it would work. You just have to turn it over and open up the floorplate to get that 6th round in there.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •