I couldn't find any info on MN receiver material. Supposedly its fairly soft and unlikely to blow up under heavy loads - expands instead.
But the MN has some problems that make me keep it in original military configuration and would stop me from spending much money on it:
The bolt handle is too far forward for fast, easy manipulation.
The split bridge makes it hard to install a conventional scope and side mounts are less efficient.
The safety is poor.
I believe there's only 1 trigger mod available.
The external magazine makes the rifle clumsy to carry on a hunt.
Gas handling/protection provisions are mediocre.
The WWII Soviet rifles are poorly finished.
211 BC: I swear by Jupiter Optimus Maximus .... in the army of the consul Gnaeus Fulvius Centumalus Maximus and for 10 miles around it I will not steal anything worth more than a denarius in any one day.
2016 AD: To enhance our community's aggregate through multi-platform metrics of media synergy catalyzing integrated outcomes of macro-disciplines toward inclusive methodology paradigms generating positive algorithms of unwavering commitment to our children, the flag, and God.