Silencer Opponents Stomped By Washington Post Fact Check
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Silencer Opponents Stomped By Washington Post Fact Check

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Oldsmar, FL (Tampa Bay)

    Default Silencer Opponents Stomped By Washington Post Fact Check

    Surprising, given the anti-gun and extreme Liberal editorial policy of the Washington Post.

    Giffords Group For Lies About Silencers

    Posted at 9:52 am on March 20, 2017 by Bob Owens, Bearing Arms

    Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post is calling out New York’s junior Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and the gun-grabbers of Americans for Responsible Solutions for lying about firearm silencers in their desperate opposition to the Hearing Protection Act.

    “You know what protects your hearing better than a silencer? Ear plugs.”
    — Americans for a Responsible Solution, in a tweet, March 13

    “When someone gets shot by a gun with a silencer, it’s quiet. Witnesses might not hear. Police will be less likely to track down the shooter.”
    — Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), in a tweet, March 14

    Congress is preparing to debate the so-called Hearing Protection Act, which would streamline the purchase of suppressors for firearms. To buy a suppressor, more popularly known as a silencer, one must meet a number of requirements that result in a nine-month approval process (including submitting fingerprints and a photograph) and a $200 tax stamp. (A silencer generally costs hundreds of dollars, and can easily top $1,000.) The legislation would make buying a suppressor as easy as buying a firearm (with an instant background check), and do away with the tax stamp and federal registration.

    We obviously take no position on whether this proposed law would be good or bad, but we were curious about this pair of tweets. Americans for a Responsible Solution (ARS), in its tweet, further noted that the law “would make it easier for active shooters to inflict serious harm on our communities without being detected by trained law enforcement professionals.”

    What’s the impact of a suppressor on firearm noise? Does it actually make the firearm quiet or is that simply something you see in the movies?

    Kessler goes on to challenge and dissect claims made by spokespersons for Gillibrand, Americans For Responsible Solutions, and the Violence Policy Center (another gun control group we’ve busted for falsifying reports in the past), with a little help from yours truly.

    I don’t want to steal too much of Kessler’s thunder, so read the whole article at the Washington Post, and share it with your friends, especially those who got their education on silencers from the movies.
    211 BC: I swear by Jupiter Optimus Maximus .... in the army of the consul Gnaeus Fulvius Centumalus Maximus and for 10 miles around it I will not steal anything worth more than a denarius in any one day.

    2016 AD: To enhance our community's aggregate through multi-platform metrics of media synergy catalyzing integrated outcomes of macro-disciplines toward inclusive methodology paradigms generating positive algorithms of unwavering commitment to our children, the flag, and God.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Pennsylvania where Johnny Reb got new shoes !


    Strange times we live in indeed !
    The Wash Po actually publishing an article about firearms that debunks some of the anti gun groups BS.

    Never thought I'd see it !

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    central Ks


    Perhaps the ComPost is trying to move away from publishing Fake News..............................
    I don't always venture out into the sub-freezing darkness, but when I do, it is hunting season, and I carry a Browning. Stay hungry my friends.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts