View attachment 125935
i just watched some show on t.v. last week saying that "with their OWN test shootings" they could conclude beyond any doubt oswald WAS the lone shooter.. (i don't think so!)
Wasn't the final head shot at a max of 85 yards?Wasn't far at all for a medium powered rifle.I"ve stood a few feet from where Oswald did a few times, and it's not that far from where he was standing to where the bullet struck, especially in light of the fact Oswald was good with a rifle.
He qualified in the Marines! IIRC he was considered a moderate shooter but again thats based on the Marines standard. Factor in he used a scope and was shooting at well under 100 yards. Also don't forget he missed completely once and was low a good 6-8 inches the second shot. If he was shooting at a paper target he'd have a rather crappy score.I don't think there is actually any evidence that Oswald was a good shot. He would certainly have been quite a bad judge of a rifle. ........ But for making a dependable kill in circumstances that demaned quick shooting, it was poor, and the scope was indefensible. One thing I think can be ruled out, is that he wasn't put there as a genuine assassin by any organisation with another $20 in the funds.
OK.Saint John Hunt, a crack head (or was it meth?) doper looser jobless bum looking to make money how ever he can to avoid work.
It seems like you're trying to take both sides of the arguement.IIRC he never produced the supposed death bed confessions. Or if he did, Howard was also a writer of 'spy' novels and bitter for serving time for Watergate. Think about it.
So if he did, in fact, confess to involvement in the JFK assassination you're saying it was because of bitterness over Watergate?
Please explain the connection between the assassination of JFK and Watergate in the case of H.Hunt.
He wrote spy novels, so what?
Why would a man with a storied career in the OSS/CIA make something up as he was dying?
What would be the point? He was dying!
Seals what up?The fact that E.Howard said there was a French gunman at the grassy knoll pretty much seals it up since the angles and line of sight completely leaves no doubt there wasn't a shooter in that position.
The next statementyou're saying now that Hunt confessed???The fact that E.Howard said...
I'm trying to understand, but your post is contradicting and doesn't make sense to me.
I'm trying to understand your logic.
That says it all, as far as I'm concerned. I agree 100% with Clyde.Oliver Stone, on the other hand, is not JUST a nut, though that too. He's a villain who intentionally distorts history not for dramatic effect in a commercial film, but rather to promote a POV (an untruthful one hostile to American ideals).
My own conviction is - one shooter. And that the shooter was Lee Harvey Oswald, from the sixth floor of the Dallas School Book Depository.